Your keys outlive you — they do not depart with you for good.

• A significant part of your capital lives in crypto wallets, on exchanges and behind access only you know.
• If something happened to you today, your heirs could not find the keys — or would find them and not know what to do with them.
• You want neither to hand the keys to someone in your lifetime, nor to leave them on a slip of paper in a safe, nor to lose them when you are gone.

What the House does

The House designs a custody and transfer protocol that meets two contradictory demands at once: the keys stay under your sole control while you live, and become available to your heirs once you are gone — without anyone gaining them before their time. The technique is chosen for your case and bound to a legal shell, so the transfer is not only possible but lawful.

• An inventory of digital assets: wallets, exchange accounts, keys, access, domains — held in one secured register.
• An architecture for key custody and succession: secret-sharing among trusted parties, multisignature, deferred access — the mechanism chosen for your risk profile.
• Instructions for heirs: what exists, where it sits, and which steps lead to recovery — without disclosing the keys themselves in your lifetime.
• A legal shell: the protocol bound to the will and the structure, so the heirs’ right is formalised rather than left to goodwill.
• A procedure for updating the protocol as new assets appear, custody changes, or the roster of trusted parties shifts.

What you get: a secured register of digital assets · a custody architecture with secret-sharing among trusted parties and multisignature · instructions for heirs that disclose no keys in your lifetime · a legal shell bound to the will

Why this way and not another

• A seed phrase in a safe or in your head: either no one will find it, or the wrong person will.
• A will sets out flats and accounts but is silent on wallets the notary neither sees nor understands.
• Handing the keys to someone in your lifetime means surrendering control; not handing them over means risking that they are lost.
• An exchange or custodian holds part of the assets, but recovery of access by heirs is a separate, unresolved question.

What worries you — and the House’s answer

• “If someone gains the keys, I lose control of the assets while I am alive.” — The mechanism is built so that, in your lifetime, sole control stays with you; access opens only after you are gone.
• “I’ll write down instructions — and they become a map for theft.” — The secret is shared among parties, none of whom can open the wallet alone; the instructions lead to recovery without revealing the keys.
• “My heirs still won’t make sense of crypto.” — The protocol leaves them clear steps and a formalised right, not a raw set of keys, and names trusted parties to carry it out.

Where this leads

The digital part of the estate ceases to be the thing that dies with its owner. While you live, the keys stay yours; once you are gone, your heirs receive a clear path to recovery and a formalised right to it. Nothing you have created in this form is lost merely because there was no one to pass the password to.